Sexual Orientation Future for Census
15 November 201
It has just been a matter of time down the slippery slope of progressive madness overseas and now in NZ with recent news that biological chromosomal males are able to identify as a female and change their birth certificate to female. It is fast becoming possible for anybody to identify as whatever they like however farcical it may seem. In Holland a 69 year old man wants to identify as a 49 year old and wants his age changed legally. It only seems fair that if biologically you can identify as to what ever gender identity you want then biologically you can be whatever age you want such is the progressive slide into identity chaos.
The Judge considering the age identity change was skeptical but had noted that changing sex on a birth certificate was once not possible but now is allowed. It doesn't take much imagination to see that there is no end to this "identity" issue and the door is now wide open to be legally whatever you think you are and expect other people to agree with you in the madness. Surely this is the case of the Emperor wearing no clothes as an age old adage most aptly suited.
To add fire to this stupidity we now have the NZ Department of Statistics issuing findings from a Sexual Orientation "public" consultation. Their mission was to explore how to gather, organise and report sexual identity information and statistics through the Census. The report noted that suggestions made included "removing binary language, updating some definitions to reflect modern usage, and including more aspects and identities that were not present in the proposed framework." "Most submitters (85 percent) also agreed that a 'refuse to answer' option should be included in the question design." (full report:
No doubt we will see questions in the next Census that try to establish how many of each identity exist in NZ. It may be that many people will object to the questions even being asked and choose instead to sabotage the survey by picking one of the most obscure gender identities that will be shown to exist. Should people misrepresent their true biological identity in the census then this will skew survey results and no doubt boost the arguments of those progressives that try and tell us of the so called large percentage of the population that are not really male or female.
New Conservative believes research that shows gender identity issues are psychological and not physiological is clear, and therefore gender dysphoria should be dealt with as any other psychological/mental health issue (See Family Policy). Gender identity should not be taught in schools, apart from offering help for those struggling in that area. Students should use bathrooms, changing rooms and participate in sport based on their biological gender. And why is it that what is taught in schools is not allowed to be made public! (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10155856379897997&set=gm.2012883282083132&type=3)